[Attorney Shinnosuke Nitta]
I contributed the 15th installment of the series "Legal Advice on Re-Jewelry," titled "Future Anti-Money Laundering Measures Part 1: 'Only Dealing with Cases Over 2 Million Yen is No Longer Dangerous - Misunderstood Basics of AML'," to "Reborn." vol. 57, published by the Japan Re-Jewelry Association.
Attorney Shinnosuke Nitta "Ribbon" published by the Japan Re-Jewelry Association.In Vol. 57, I contributed the 15th installment of the series "Re-Jewelry Legal Advice," titled "Future Anti-Money Laundering Measures Part 1: 'Only Dealing with Items Over 2 Million Yen is No Longer Dangerous - Misunderstood Basics of AML'."
In this article,
- Is it correct to assume that "identity verification is not required for transactions under 200 million yen"? - A common misconception about basic AML (Anti-Money Laundering) measures.
・Important points to note regarding installment payments, trade-ins, and buybacks, which are often overlooked.
Recent trends in AML practices involve judging not only based on formal monetary criteria, but also from the perspective of whether the transaction is "substantially suspicious."
This article explains topics such as these.
【2026.5.7】
MiKoTama email magazine
Distributing various legal information topics via email newsletter
Other announcements
